Memory upgrade - Dual channel activation I have finally facts and benchmarks!
Memory upgrade along Dual channel activation, at a laptop this appears to have lesser degree of
impressive benefits when compared to desktop PC.
Windows Experience Index From 4GB elevating at 8GB, the evaluation changed from
5.9 points to 6.8 points ( 7.9 Max scale)
AIDA64 Cache and memory benchmark The screenshots bellow its a proof and confirmation, that my Laptop now succeeds DDR3 relative performance equal to what was expected for the specific INTEL memory controller.
My comparison point this is a
Packard Bell EasyNote LM98 Benchmark results about
DDR3 bandwidth alone these are now identical to
ASUS X52JU SX335VUser experience with 8GB of Ram The Windows operating system it is the first that requires a portion of RAM to operate, and the responsibility here this is at the heads of Microsoft engineers and company strategy.
For us not gaming with a laptop, Firefox and due Internet navigation, this is our challenge so to deal with.
I will simply confirm that 8GB of RAM, these are enough so our system to have open several instances of Firefox with out us to feel any system slowdown.
Plenty of RAM within a PC, this never helped it, to startup or close-down any faster.
Since the beginning of PC computing, all due hardware upgrades benefits they are measured in
milliseconds, this is a fraction of time that us humans we are unable to feel such differences.
And this is of why we use synthetic benchmarks so us to receive any proofs of improvement.
My laptop and it overall performance this is better than before, no further hardware upgrades are possible.
It feels good to know, that in hardware level, this is now complete.
In conclusion My offering this is another one confirmation of what is real DDR3 performance index of:
HM55 INTEL iron lake-M Mobile IntelĀ® HM55 Express Chipset
Launch Date Q1'2010
Lithography 65 nm
TDP 3.5W
IntelĀ® 5 Series Chipsets
DDR3 memory bandwidth = officially undocumented