!!

Welcome to our Forum, extension and content sharing platform of Electrical Test and Measurement Product Reviews Blog.

 
Registration this is Free, we accept contributors of 17 years old and above. We do not accept registration with Gmail

Active since 7 June 2012  


Copyright Notice: Entire ITTSB.EU content & images they are copyright protected. - Forum search engine disabled to Guests - No need of you using Adblock software.

Author Topic: shielded VS plastic cover for D-SUB connectors  (Read 68 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kiriakos GR

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Location: Greece
  • Posts: 2288
  • Country: gr
    • ittsb.eu
  • job title: Industrial Maintenance Electrician
shielded VS plastic cover for D-SUB connectors
« on: November 07, 2024, 06:47:10 PM »
If you come to the point to wonder about shielded VS plastic cover for D-SUB connectors.
You better gain as fist the pricing awareness about the three type of D-SUB (hoods , backshell or a cover).

1) D-SUB Plastic Backshell  =  0.50 EUR
2) D-SUB Metalised Plastic  =  3.50 EUR
3) D-SUB Metal Backshell   = 10+ EUR
(average retail prices with VAT).

Metalised Plastic and Metal Backshell, they offer EMI/RFI shielding.
Metal Backshell = most robust type.
Plastic and metalized plastic, identical robustness characteristics.
 
Next logical question, this is of how to determine if you need to use a better in design D-SUB backshell?
There is not any easy answers at this question.

But there is always the practical method of test and trial.
Example:
Did you detect data transmission instability at high data rate?
Did you detect occasional data transmission instability?
Then the Metalised Plastic cover it might be of what you need.

So far I cannot find over the internet proofs or hard evidence, in favor of shielding superiority of a Metal Backshell.
While I have awareness that EMI shielding this is relative to metal thickens, the actual wall thickness of D-SUB metal backshell this is specific and approximately at 2.5mm or less.
From the other hand, the cable in use for data transfer, this has always a much lesser in thickens shield.

In theory, an aluminum case with 15mm of wall thickness, this is the ultimate shield against any source of EMI.
       

Quick summary:
I think that the quality of the data transmission cable, this has a higher impact in favor of a better shielding.
I would consider the use of D-SUB Metalised Plastic, only if they are many data connections of the same type within a restricted in free-space cabinet.
WWW.ITTSB.EU   Industrial Test Tools Scoreboard  (Product Reviews Blog) / Editor in Chief.
The content of this Web site is copyright protected

Offline Andrew-88

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 132
  • Country: gr
  • job title: Electrician
Re: shielded VS plastic cover for D-SUB connectors
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2024, 09:36:34 PM »
if it's not broken don't fix  :)

EMI/RFI both are unseen hazards, and most of times interference caused by nearby high power machinery.
I think also as reasonable your suggestion, about the use of standard plastic cover for D-SUB. 
Especially for indoor systems, in which environmental temperature this is stable.

D-SUB Metal Backshell, this is a rare choice, for rare applications.

 

ITTSB.EU Blog

General Data Protection Regulation GDPR ITTSB.EU Home Page Reward us by a Donation - Sponsorship TsDMMViewer Data Logger for FLUKE 884xA

ITTSB Blog - Sponsors

protosnet.com - Internet solutions FLUKE benchtop DMM Repair Services

Recommended Links

Hellenic Accreditation System E.SY.D. Portal of city Volos - Greece Clean Up and Customize Facebook Firefox Backup Tool 32bit / 64 bit Winaero Tweaker = Win7 Fonts size fix