What was the mistake that you did find at the wrong formula?
But wait, the only thing that can go wrong this is Energy input / output, this to be reversed.
The reversed formula will give 119% instead ..
So the NEW triple DC load, this is now verified as be successful
All true about the formula.
When I did use the wrong one and got 119%, my first thought was WTF is going on ?
The triple DC load due the simplicity of the electrical design, it will deliver named VA-Watt load, at every PSU that all voltage rails does not sag under load, below the named output.
For example, original design calculation for 12V rail = 12.100V x 22A = 266,2 VA | Watt
Another parameter this is warm-up time of the Load-tester prior taking seriously any measurements.
I am going to need few more days, for testing and so to understand of how I should use it as comparison point.